One reviewer noted that Fortinet Fortigate is so easy to set up that it could be deployed in just a couple of clicks.
Ease of Deployment: For the most part, users of Fortinet Fortigate feel that deploying it is relatively easy and straightforward. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below. First, the CLI interface is very hard to adapt as the commands and directory hierarchy is very different for common syntax and standards.We performed a comparison between Fortinet Fortigate and Cisco SD-WAN based on our users’ reviews in four categories. Though, I think Fortigate is one of the best options for small and mid-sized organizations, there are some areas for improvement. Type of tunnel can be easily configured - Full Tunnel or Split Tunnel for SSL. SSL VPN configuration - The deep CLI-level debugging is also very helpful in troubleshooting. 
SLA based monitoring of Internet Links / MPLS links, makes it even better to choose the links on the basis of performance (Latency, packet loss, Jitter etc). Be it 3 or more Internet Links, multiple Subnets/segments of users to distribute and bandwidth load balancing for links and users. SD-WAN - Load balancing of Internet traffic is a USP of Fortigate and makes it stand tall in the competition. Fortigate has a very well refined and functional SD-WAN solution when it comes to load balancing for normal Internet Traffic. There are some extra points that inclined us to use Fortigate as our main Firewall.
OSS/BSS (Operations Support/Business Support)įor FortiGate Firewall, the basic functionality and requirement is met easily as Fortigate is among market leaders in NGFW. 
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS). Application Performance Management (APM).
0 kommentar(er)
